Comparison

ACCUNIQ BC300 vs InBody 120

ACCUNIQ BC300 and InBody 120: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

ACCUNIQ BC300: when to consider it

ACCUNIQ BC300 uses multi-frequency BIA with eight contact electrodes. Results include estimated whole-body and regional fat and muscle for the arms, legs and trunk. Its foldable design supports transport.

InBody 120: when to consider it

InBody120 is useful for following fat and muscle while changing your diet or activity. A meaningful consultation benefits from the full computer-generated report; the small display shows only part of the results.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsACCUNIQ BC300InBody 120
MethodMulti-frequency BIANot verified
Measurement frequencies5, 50, 250 kHz20, 100 kHz
Electrodes8 contact electrodesNot verified
Maximum weight200 kgNot verified
Measured regionsBoth arms, both legs and trunkNot verified
Recording timeNot verified≈ 17 s
Body weight rangeNot verified5–250 kg
Height rangeNot verified50–300 cm
Device weightNot verified4.3 kg
Contact electrodesNot verified8
Measurement positionNot verifiedStanding
Operating temperatureNot verified10–40 °C
Dimensions (width × depth × height)Not verified392 × 434 × 55.2 mm · without the optional standEvidence
Age in the cited catalogueNot verified3–99 yearsEvidence
Impedance measurementsNot verified10Evidence
DisplayNot verified48 × 24 mm FSTN LCDEvidence
Documented interfacesNot verifiedRS-232C and Bluetooth; detailed report through LookinBodyModel sources
PowerNot verifiedFour AA batteries or a mains adapterModel sources
Optional standNot verified393 × 516 × 732 mm; total weight with stand 5.7 kgModel sources
Report formatsNot verifiedScreen, optional thermal printer, full report through LookinBodyModel sources
ControlsNot verifiedButtons and a separate handpiece; height is enteredModel sources

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification