Comparison

ACCUNIQ BC300 vs Tanita MC-780MA

ACCUNIQ BC300 and Tanita MC-780MA: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

ACCUNIQ BC300: when to consider it

ACCUNIQ BC300 uses multi-frequency BIA with eight contact electrodes. Results include estimated whole-body and regional fat and muscle for the arms, legs and trunk. Its foldable design supports transport.

Tanita MC-780MA: when to consider it

MC-780MA is a multi-frequency segmental BIA analyser. The manufacturer catalogue lists fat, muscle and body-water estimates with regional results and SD-card storage. MA alone still does not distinguish the column-mounted P and separate S configurations.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsACCUNIQ BC300Tanita MC-780MA
MethodMulti-frequency BIAMulti-frequency BIA
Measurement frequencies5, 50, 250 kHzNot verified
Electrodes8 contact electrodesNot verified
Maximum weight200 kgNot verified
Measured regionsBoth arms, both legs and trunkBoth arms, both legs and trunk
Recording timeNot verifiedUnder 20 s; excluding preparation and consultation
Documented outputsNot verifiedFat, muscle and fat-free mass, body water

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification