Comparison

ACCUNIQ BC720 vs InBody 120

ACCUNIQ BC720 and InBody 120: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

ACCUNIQ BC720: when to consider it

ACCUNIQ BC720 uses multi-frequency BIA with eight contact electrodes. Results include estimated whole-body and regional fat and muscle for the arms, legs and trunk. BC720 also reports extracellular water and phase angle.

InBody 120: when to consider it

InBody120 is useful for following fat and muscle while changing your diet or activity. A meaningful consultation benefits from the full computer-generated report; the small display shows only part of the results.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsACCUNIQ BC720InBody 120
MethodMulti-frequency BIANot verified
Measurement frequencies1, 5, 50, 250, 550, 1000 kHz20, 100 kHz
Electrodes8 contact electrodesNot verified
Maximum weight270 kgNot verified
Measured regionsBoth arms, both legs and trunkNot verified
Recording timeNot verified≈ 17 s
Body weight rangeNot verified5–250 kg
Height rangeNot verified50–300 cm
Device weightNot verified4.3 kg
Contact electrodesNot verified8
Measurement positionNot verifiedStanding
Operating temperatureNot verified10–40 °C
Dimensions (width × depth × height)Not verified392 × 434 × 55.2 mm · without the optional standEvidence
Age in the cited catalogueNot verified3–99 yearsEvidence
Impedance measurementsNot verified10Evidence
DisplayNot verified48 × 24 mm FSTN LCDEvidence
Documented interfacesNot verifiedRS-232C and Bluetooth; detailed report through LookinBodyModel sources
PowerNot verifiedFour AA batteries or a mains adapterModel sources
Optional standNot verified393 × 516 × 732 mm; total weight with stand 5.7 kgModel sources
Report formatsNot verifiedScreen, optional thermal printer, full report through LookinBodyModel sources
ControlsNot verifiedButtons and a separate handpiece; height is enteredModel sources

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification