Comparison

ACCUNIQ BC720 vs Tanita MC-780

ACCUNIQ BC720 and Tanita MC-780: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

ACCUNIQ BC720: when to consider it

ACCUNIQ BC720 uses multi-frequency BIA with eight contact electrodes. Results include estimated whole-body and regional fat and muscle for the arms, legs and trunk. BC720 also reports extracellular water and phase angle.

Tanita MC-780: when to consider it

The MC-780 family uses multi-frequency segmental BIA to report fat, muscle mass and body water, including regional results. A base designation does not identify the P/S configuration or MA/MA-N generation.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsACCUNIQ BC720Tanita MC-780
MethodMulti-frequency BIAMulti-frequency BIA
Measurement frequencies1, 5, 50, 250, 550, 1000 kHzNot verified
Electrodes8 contact electrodesNot verified
Maximum weight270 kgNot verified
Measured regionsBoth arms, both legs and trunkBoth arms, both legs and trunk
Documented outputsNot verifiedFat, muscle mass, body water; regional results
Designation scopeNot verifiedFamily; variant unspecified

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification