Comparison

InBody 970 vs Tanita MC-780MA

InBody 970 and Tanita MC-780MA: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

InBody 970: when to consider it

InBody 970/970S is a professional series for segmental body-composition analysis, including body water and phase angle. The variants differ in frequencies and testing time; location details identify the exact model.

Tanita MC-780MA: when to consider it

MC-780MA is a multi-frequency segmental BIA analyser. The manufacturer catalogue lists fat, muscle and body-water estimates with regional results and SD-card storage. MA alone still does not distinguish the column-mounted P and separate S configurations.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsInBody 970Tanita MC-780MA
Recording time≈ 70 sUnder 20 s; excluding preparation and consultation
Body weight range5–300 kgNot verified
Height range95–220 cmNot verified
Device weight46 kgNot verified
Measurement frequencies1, 5, 50, 250, 500 kHz; 1, 2, 3 MHzNot verified
Contact electrodes8Not verified
Measurement positionStandingNot verified
Method and electrodesDSM-BIA / SMF-BIA; 8 tactile electrodesNot verified
Measured segmentsRight and left arm, trunk, right and left legNot verified
MethodNot verifiedMulti-frequency BIA
Measured regionsNot verifiedBoth arms, both legs and trunk
Documented outputsNot verifiedFat, muscle and fat-free mass, body water
Dimensions (width × depth × height)614.1 × 963.8 × 1,239.9 mmEvidenceNot verified
Age in the cited catalogue3–99 yearsEvidenceNot verified
Impedance measurements40EvidenceNot verified
Device internal database capacity100,000 recordsModel sourcesNot verified
Display10.1″ colour TFT LCD; 1,280 × 800Model sourcesNot verified
Display diagonal10.1″Model sourcesNot verified
Documented interfaces4× RS-232C, 2× USB host, USB device, Ethernet, Wi-Fi, BluetoothModel sourcesNot verified

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification