Comparison

ACCUNIQ BC300 vs InBody 170

ACCUNIQ BC300 and InBody 170: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

ACCUNIQ BC300: when to consider it

ACCUNIQ BC300 uses multi-frequency BIA with eight contact electrodes. Results include estimated whole-body and regional fat and muscle for the arms, legs and trunk. Its foldable design supports transport.

InBody 170: when to consider it

The older InBody170 provides a basic overview for weight loss and muscle-building goals. It can also help you follow existing measurements: a consultation can examine changes in fat, muscle and their distribution.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsACCUNIQ BC300InBody 170
MethodMulti-frequency BIANot verified
Measurement frequencies5, 50, 250 kHz20, 100 kHz
Electrodes8 contact electrodesNot verified
Maximum weight200 kgNot verified
Measured regionsBoth arms, both legs and trunkNot verified
Recording timeNot verified30 s
Body weight rangeNot verified10–250 kg
Height rangeNot verified95–220 cm
Device weightNot verified14.3 kg
Contact electrodesNot verified8
Measurement positionNot verifiedStanding
Operating temperatureNot verified10–40 °C
Dimensions (width × depth × height)Not verified396 × 608 × 955 mmEvidence
Age in the cited catalogueNot verified3–99 yearsEvidence
Impedance measurementsNot verified10Evidence
DisplayNot verifiedEBTN LCD and buttonsEvidence
Documented interfacesNot verifiedRS-232C and USB connection to a computer; compatibility depends on the original software.Model sources
Result sheetNot verifiedThermal printout; further result handling depends on the original softwareModel sources
Height entryNot verifiedHeight is entered; the analyser itself does not measure itModel sources

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification