Comparison

ACCUNIQ BC300 vs InBody 230

ACCUNIQ BC300 and InBody 230: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

ACCUNIQ BC300: when to consider it

ACCUNIQ BC300 uses multi-frequency BIA with eight contact electrodes. Results include estimated whole-body and regional fat and muscle for the arms, legs and trunk. Its foldable design supports transport.

InBody 230: when to consider it

InBody230 is an older model you may encounter at nutrition practices. It helps put weight changes in the context of fat and muscle. Testing is most useful with results explained and compared with previous visits.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsACCUNIQ BC300InBody 230
MethodMulti-frequency BIANot verified
Measurement frequencies5, 50, 250 kHz20, 100 kHz
Electrodes8 contact electrodesNot verified
Maximum weight200 kgNot verified
Measured regionsBoth arms, both legs and trunkNot verified
Recording timeNot verified30 s
Body weight rangeNot verified10–250 kg
Height rangeNot verified95–220 cm
Device weightNot verified14.5 kg
Contact electrodesNot verified8
Measurement positionNot verifiedStanding
Operating temperatureNot verified10–40 °C
Dimensions (width × depth × height)Not verified356 × 843 × 984 mmEvidence
Age in the cited catalogueNot verified3–99 yearsEvidence
Impedance measurementsNot verified10Evidence
Device internal database capacityNot verified1,000 recordsEvidence
DisplayNot verified240 × 320 colour LCD and buttonsEvidence
Documented interfacesNot verifiedRS-232C, USB computer connection and USB printer connection; transfer depends on compatible legacy software.Model sources
ConstructionNot verifiedFoldable stand; transport in a suitable carrying caseModel sources
Result sheetsNot verifiedAdult and children’s sheets; optional thermal printingModel sources
Height entryNot verifiedEntered manually; the scale does not measure height itselfModel sources

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification