Comparison

InBody 970 vs Tanita BC-1000

InBody 970 and Tanita BC-1000: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

InBody 970: when to consider it

InBody 970/970S is a professional series for segmental body-composition analysis, including body water and phase angle. The variants differ in frequencies and testing time; location details identify the exact model.

Tanita BC-1000: when to consider it

BC-1000 is a body-composition scale that transmits results wirelessly to a compatible receiver. Its manual lists fat, muscle and body water; capacity is 200 kg. BC-1000 Plus is a different version; accessories may vary in a package labelled “PROFI”.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsInBody 970Tanita BC-1000
Recording time≈ 70 sNot verified
Body weight range5–300 kgNot verified
Height range95–220 cmNot verified
Device weight46 kgNot verified
Measurement frequencies1, 5, 50, 250, 500 kHz; 1, 2, 3 MHzNot verified
Contact electrodes8Not verified
Measurement positionStandingNot verified
Method and electrodesDSM-BIA / SMF-BIA; 8 tactile electrodesNot verified
Measured segmentsRight and left arm, trunk, right and left legNot verified
MethodNot verifiedBioelectrical impedance (BIA)
Maximum weightNot verified200 kg
Documented outputsNot verifiedBody fat, muscle mass and body water
Result displayNot verifiedCompatible wireless receiver / external display
Dimensions (width × depth × height)614.1 × 963.8 × 1,239.9 mmEvidenceNot verified
Age in the cited catalogue3–99 yearsEvidenceNot verified
Impedance measurements40EvidenceNot verified
Device internal database capacity100,000 recordsModel sourcesNot verified
Display10.1″ colour TFT LCD; 1,280 × 800Model sourcesNot verified
Display diagonal10.1″Model sourcesNot verified
Documented interfaces4× RS-232C, 2× USB host, USB device, Ethernet, Wi-Fi, BluetoothModel sourcesNot verified

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification