Comparison

InBody BWA 2.0 vs Nutriguard-MS

InBody BWA 2.0 and Nutriguard-MS: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

InBody BWA 2.0: when to consider it

The BWA 2.0 focuses on detailed body-water and composition results. Wrist and ankle clamps also allow bedside testing. Its results are especially useful where muscle changes need to be read alongside water changes.

Nutriguard-MS: when to consider it

Nutriguard-MS measures bioelectrical impedance at 5, 50 and 100 kHz. Standard testing uses four adhesive electrodes on the hand and foot of one side. Body-composition and water estimates are evaluated from resistance and reactance using the relevant software; regional mode requires the appropriate procedure.

Specifications side by side

The filter keeps rows with undocumented values. More features or a different value alone do not establish better measurement accuracy.

Practical specifications

Practical specifications: InBody BWA 2.0 vs Nutriguard-MS
SpecificationInBody BWA 2.0Nutriguard-MS
Recording timeA documented value is missing≈ 90 s (Medical); ≈ 3 min (Research)Model sources 1Model sources 2Model sources 3Model sources 4Model sources 5Not documented
Body weight rangeA documented value is missing10–300 kgModel sources 1Model sources 2Model sources 3Model sources 4Model sources 5Not documented
Height rangeA documented value is missing95–220 cmModel sources 1Model sources 2Model sources 3Model sources 4Model sources 5Not documented
Measurement positionA documented value is missingSupine, seated or standingModel sources 1Model sources 2Model sources 3Model sources 4Model sources 5Not documented
Age in the cited catalogueA documented value is missing3–99 yearsEvidenceNot documented
Documented outputsA documented value is missingNot documentedResistance and reactance; body-composition interpretation through softwareModel sources

Technical specifications

Technical specifications: InBody BWA 2.0 vs Nutriguard-MS
SpecificationInBody BWA 2.0Nutriguard-MS
Device weightA documented value is missing3.3 kgModel sources 1Model sources 2Model sources 3Model sources 4Model sources 5Not documented
Measurement frequenciesDifferent documented values1, 5, 50, 250, 500 kHz; 1, 2, 3 MHzModel sources 1Model sources 2Model sources 3Model sources 4Model sources 55, 50, 100 kHzModel sources
Contact electrodesA documented value is missing16Model sources 1Model sources 2Model sources 3Model sources 4Model sources 5Not documented
Operating temperatureA documented value is missing10–40 °CModel sources 1Model sources 2Model sources 3Model sources 4Model sources 5Not documented
Dimensions (width × depth × height)A documented value is missing322 × 282 × 81.5 mmEvidenceNot documented
Impedance measurementsA documented value is missing40EvidenceNot documented
Device internal database capacityA documented value is missing100,000 recordsEvidenceNot documented
DisplayA documented value is missingColour touchscreen TFT LCD, 1280 × 800 pixelsEvidenceNot documented
Documented interfacesA documented value is missingRS-232C, USB Host, USB Slave, Ethernet, Bluetooth and Wi-FiEvidenceNot documented
Display diagonalA documented value is missing10.1″Model sourcesNot documented
Electrode contactA documented value is missingWrist and ankle clamps; adhesive electrodes available as accessoriesModel sourcesNot documented
Weight for the resultA documented value is missingObtained separately, without a built-in weighing platformModel sourcesNot documented
Report typesA documented value is missingWater, composition, evaluation, research, comparison, child and thermalModel sourcesNot documented
Portable useA documented value is missingThe analyser can be used with a trolley or transport accessoriesModel sourcesNot documented
MethodA documented value is missingNot documentedMulti-frequency BIAModel sources
ElectrodesA documented value is missingNot documented4 adhesive electrodes for whole-body testingModel sources

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification