Tanita MC-780 vs Tanita RD-545HR
Tanita MC-780 and Tanita RD-545HR: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.
Tanita MC-780: when to consider it
The MC-780 family uses multi-frequency segmental BIA to report fat, muscle mass and body water, including regional results. A base designation does not identify the P/S configuration or MA/MA-N generation.
Tanita RD-545HR: when to consider it
RD-545HR uses dual-frequency segmental BIA with a handle and app connection. It provides fat, muscle and regional results as well as heart rate. HR distinguishes it from the original RD-545; a scale’s bone-mass estimate is distinct from bone densitometry.
Specifications side by side
Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.
| Specifications | Tanita MC-780 | Tanita RD-545HR |
|---|---|---|
| Method | Multi-frequency BIA | Dual-frequency BIA |
| Measured regions | Both arms, both legs and trunk | Both arms, both legs and trunk |
| Documented outputs | Fat, muscle mass, body water; regional results | Fat, muscle mass, water, regional results and heart rate |
| Designation scope | Family; variant unspecified | Not verified |
| Maximum weight | Not verified | 200 kg |
Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.