Comparison

InBody 170 vs Tanita BC-1000

InBody 170 and Tanita BC-1000: compare documented specifications, features and limitations. Check the reports and explanation offered by the provider. More features alone do not establish better accuracy.

InBody 170: when to consider it

The older InBody170 provides a basic overview for weight loss and muscle-building goals. It can also help you follow existing measurements: a consultation can examine changes in fat, muscle and their distribution.

Tanita BC-1000: when to consider it

BC-1000 is a body-composition scale that transmits results wirelessly to a compatible receiver. Its manual lists fat, muscle and body water; capacity is 200 kg. BC-1000 Plus is a different version; accessories may vary in a package labelled “PROFI”.

Specifications side by side

Highlighted rows differ. Unknown values stay unknown.

SpecificationsInBody 170Tanita BC-1000
Recording time30 sNot verified
Body weight range10–250 kgNot verified
Height range95–220 cmNot verified
Device weight14.3 kgNot verified
Measurement frequencies20, 100 kHzNot verified
Contact electrodes8Not verified
Measurement positionStandingNot verified
Operating temperature10–40 °CNot verified
MethodNot verifiedBioelectrical impedance (BIA)
Maximum weightNot verified200 kg
Documented outputsNot verifiedBody fat, muscle mass and body water
Result displayNot verifiedCompatible wireless receiver / external display
Dimensions (width × depth × height)396 × 608 × 955 mmEvidenceNot verified
Age in the cited catalogue3–99 yearsEvidenceNot verified
Impedance measurements10EvidenceNot verified
DisplayEBTN LCD and buttonsEvidenceNot verified
Documented interfacesRS-232C and USB connection to a computer; compatibility depends on the original software.Model sourcesNot verified
Result sheetThermal printout; further result handling depends on the original softwareModel sourcesNot verified
Height entryHeight is entered; the analyser itself does not measure itModel sourcesNot verified

Fat-free mass is not pure muscle mass. A single result is not a diagnosis. Different devices and similarly named metrics may use definitions that are not interchangeable.

Sources and verification